Skip to main content

FALSE POSITIVE AND DISEASE

   

     In tossing coin, each event (toss) is independent event.  The outcome of one toss does not influence the next toss.  Hence the chance of getting a head is always 1/2.
     Suppose, you left your car key in one of the four rooms of your apartment.  Let us name the rooms as A,B,C and D.  The probability of finding the key in the room A is 1/4.  That is written as P(A) =1/4.
     You searched the room A thoroughly and failed to find the key.  Now the probability of finding the key in the room B is 1/3.  It is written as P(B/A)=1/3.  It is read as "probability of B given A".  Remember the symbol.

    A new disease has stroked the people.  But only one (1%) of the people is affected by that disease.  A Scientific lab has made a new 'device and kit' which detects the disease with 98% accuracy.  But there is a catch.  If a person does not have the disease, the device will falsely recognize the disease with 2% chance.  It is a 'false positive'.  98% accuracy seems to be good for us.  But let us see, how the story goes

P(A) - probability of population having disease = 1% = 0.01
P(B)- probability of population having No disease = 99% = 0.99
P(C/A) - probability of disease detected in affected population = 98%=0.98
P(C/B) - probability of disease detected (falsely) in normal population 2%=.02
we want:
P(A/C) = probability of affected population really detected by the device.

    In statistics, Bayes theorem states that
 P(A/C) = P(C/A)*P(A)/(P(C/A)*P(A) +P(C/B)*P(B))
P(A/C) = 0.98*0.01/(0.98*0.01+0.02*0.99)=33.1%

Hence the device's accuracy has gone down from 98% to 33%.  What happened?  The disease is so rare.  If you test the general public , the number of people not having the disease will greatly out number the small group that has it.  So even a very low rate of false positives will strongly impact the overall results.
    Bayes' theorem is very intriguing statistical tool.  It has many interesting and important applications.   
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

THE EARTH, A SUPER ORGANISM

     JOIN MY COURSE: "Become a programmer in a day with python"       A man called 'love lock' (what a name) proposed a theory called Gaia theory, named after Greek Goddess.      It says, "Earth is a self-regulating organism like a human being.  The organic life in it interacts with in-organic matter and maintains atmosphere, temperature and environment".  Hence the earth is still suitable for the life to thrive.      Imagine, in a particular place, there are lot of flowers.  Some flowers are white and some are darkly coloured.  We know, white reflects light and heat while dark absorbs the same.  White flowers can thrive in hot climate.  But dark flowers requires cold climate.  The absorption and reflection balances and the environment reaches average, warm temperature at which both the flowers can co-exist.  This is the essence of "Gaia" theory.      On our earth, ...

DISORDER IS THE "ORDER OF THE DAY"

         Imagine a balloon full of air.  The air molecules are moving randomly inside the balloon.  Let us pierce the balloon with a pin.  The air rushes out.  Why should not the air molecules stay inside the balloon safely and ignore the little hole?  That is not the way the world works.  The molecules always "want to occupy as many states as possible".  Hence the air goes out in the open to occupy more volume.   The things always goes into disorder (entropy) and the disorder increases with time.  The above statement is what we call "second law of thermodynamics".      Consider a cup of coffee on the table. Suppose the heat from entire room flows to your cup of coffee, the coffee will boil and the rest of the room will freeze.  Freezing means bringing things to order and arrangement.  It violates the second law.  Hence it will never happen.  Hence heat must flow from high ...

CASINO'S GAME

           Let us find out how the casino survives with mathematics.      Say, your friend invite you for a game of dice.  You must bet (wager) 2 dollars.  If you roll 'six' you will get back 8 dollars.  The game will go on for 30 rounds.  All sounds good.      The probability of rolling 'six' is 1/6.  Since the game will be played for 30 times, the 'expected win' is 30*1/6 = 5.  That is, you are expected to win 5 rounds out of 30.  Hence your gain will be 5 * 8 =40 dollars.  ok.  This also implies that you will loose 25 rounds.  Hence your loss will be 25*2 =50 dollars.  Your net gain will be gain-less = 40-50 = -10 dollars. For 30 rounds, the loss is -10 dollars, Hence, for one round =-10/30 = -1/3 dollars.  There will be a loss of -1/3 or 0.33 dollars per round.  It is not a fair game.     Let us make a simple formula to calculate  'Pa...